Jim Hewson
JHewson at karta.com
Sat May 7 13:54:19 CDT 2005
It seems to me that I remember a discussion on this list in regards to a serious bug in Access 2003. I had it installed last week and haven't had the time to play with it yet. I have clients that want the XP version, I politely steer them to 2000, because of the bloating issue. I understand that XP and 2003 will use the 2000 version just fine without repercussions. Am I correct? Thanks, Jim ________________________________ From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com on behalf of Francisco Tapia Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 7:18 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving; access-l at peach.ease.lsoft.com Subject: [AccessD] Upgrading to 2003... So some people on the list have mentioned some really neat stuff about Access 2003, today I found on buy.com <http://buy.com> that I can actually pick this up as just a standalone product vs the full Office suite... additionally I'm going to need the sagekey script for it wich is only 480, but the VS Tools for Office can be had for $178 on buy.com <http://buy.com>as well, now it does say that it's an upgrade, but my question is... an upgrade from what? I already have VS 2003 which I mainly use for deploying Reporting Services... ... any thoughts? Anybody have Access2003 and NOT like it? -- -Francisco http://pcthis.blogspot.com |PC news with out the jargon! http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More... -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com