DWUTKA at marlow.com
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Wed May 18 12:19:09 CDT 2005
Hmmmmm....good point. However, and I'm just playing devil's advocate...if a Long Integer is going to get a value too big to put into a 'foriegn' system, wouldn't there be a problem with the design of the foriegn system (if that is a true value..something that should be stored)? Know what I mean? Drew -----Original Message----- From: John Bartow [mailto:john at winhaven.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:38 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: RE: [AccessD] Data Types (was - Global Variable) I've considered no longer using Integers for variables because of the 16 bit issue. However, I have been reluctant to do so for field datatypes. When utilizing data from another non-access application this may affect how the other apps behave. Comments? John -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:24 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: RE: [AccessD] Global Variable However, Integers, while they may be misused, even if they are used correctly, they are still bad practice, because they are 16 bit variables. ========Why is that bad? If it saves you the trouble of writing code that does exactly what the data type does -- reject an inappropriate value? Why would you bother? What is bad about using the data type for its said purpose, regardless of its size? Susan H. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com