John Bartow
john at winhaven.net
Wed Nov 16 11:52:35 CST 2005
Bruce, Thanks for the input! Sounds like what you're doing is more complicated than my possible venture. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Bruen, Bruce Been running a similar scenario for a year now on a test management system that uses both an A97 (Jet 3.5) back end which is also used by a Jet 4.0 third aprty app, and a A2k "mid end" and both an A2K and an A2k3 front end. The only problems I have found have been forgetting where I was and making changes to the UI in A2k3 which are not compatible with the A2k fromt end. Sound strange? The back end is a UML model repository that we use to design the tests. It's a Jet db that starts life as an A97 db and gets used by the UML tool from http://www.sparxsystems.com.au (no relationship - highly recommended) via Jet 4.0, when we move into test execution stage we use a home-grown results recorder which I use on an A2k dev machine, the test lead uses on an A2k runtime machine and every time I go home I think of something else we could do and dev it up on A2k3..... I have on occasion also taken the db's home and up-and-down-gradeded them to A2k3 and back to "prev" without any ill effects. .... Just lucky I guess :-) Hth Bruce