Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Nov 21 19:26:45 CST 2005
Actually, that's one of my gripes. What they do isn't complex enough to justify the cost of the tools, although they add a lot of garnish to make it look like it is. Yes, with a few hours of work you could have written it and it would work the way you need it to, not in the attempted swiss army knife fashion they designed. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:52 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Database Comparison Tool Charlotte, I'm just arguing 'cause I like it, but FMS products are OK with me. For example, could I have written Analyzer with a few hours of work - assuming I even knew how? Of course, buying a suite from FMS may not be cost-effective. My 2¢, Dan Waters -----Original Message----- No, I was using the version for Access XP. It drove me nuts, frequently blew up, and would sometimes simply refuse to recognize the requests that it had just handled. I have a bias against FMS software, which I think is wildly overpriced anyhow, but this did nothing to change my opinion. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- ...hhhmmm ...surprising ...upon the occasions when I've needed to use it, it worked just as promised ...are you using one of the non-Access versions? William ----- Original Message ----- >I have to say that I have not been impressed by the FMS total detective >and wouldn't pay freeware fees for it. It is crochety and I found much >of the information everything but what I needed. Different strokes, I >suppose. > > Charlotte Foust > > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com