Reuben Cummings
reuben at gfconsultants.com
Thu Sep 8 19:44:04 CDT 2005
I agree they aren't necessarily sequential. They generally are and that's good enough for me in this argument. I agree if you HAVE to have sequential and/or consecutive numbers then you better control them manually. If not, feel free to use the autonumber for the record ID. Users LOVE it ;) Reuben Cummings GFC, LLC 812.523.1017 > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ismert > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:55 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Autonumber Assigned Immediately > > > > >> IMO, the autonumber field is simply a way > >> to create sequential numbering without > >> writing a bunch code to do so. > > You can't assume Autonumbers are sequential. You can specify random new > values for an Autonumber field. Further, for replication, Access will > change all Autonumber fields to random, to reduce key collisions. > > So, you can only assume that Autonumbers are unique. > > If you change Autonumber modes, knowingly or not, you can be fairly sure > your users will freak when they see "-1.07E+09" as the next reference > number on a report using an Autonumber field. > > -Ken > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >