Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Fri Sep 9 10:21:29 CDT 2005
True! Working with GUIDs is a total PITA, and you can't even type them in. LOL Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: MartyConnelly [mailto:martyconnelly at shaw.ca] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:11 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Autonumber Assigned Immediately Just use autonumber keys that are GUID's and watch the tears flow. Charlotte Foust wrote: >And even if they are sequential, it doesn't mean they're consecutive! > >Charlotte Foust > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ken Ismert [mailto:KIsmert at texassystems.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:55 PM >To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >Subject: Re: [AccessD] Autonumber Assigned Immediately > > > > > >>>IMO, the autonumber field is simply a way >>>to create sequential numbering without >>>writing a bunch code to do so. >>> >>> > >You can't assume Autonumbers are sequential. You can specify random new >values for an Autonumber field. Further, for replication, Access will >change all Autonumber fields to random, to reduce key collisions. > >So, you can only assume that Autonumbers are unique. > >If you change Autonumber modes, knowingly or not, you can be fairly >sure your users will freak when they see "-1.07E+09" as the next >reference number on a report using an Autonumber field. > >-Ken > > -- Marty Connelly Victoria, B.C. Canada -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com