[AccessD] Surrogates vs Natural

>>Auto-numbering is an exposed physical locator and not a surrogate."

The problem I have with that is how you're supposed to be able to hide a
surrogate.  I don't normally let users see my autonumbers, so does that
make them OK?  His statement doesn't sound like it, so I'm baffled by
what he would consider a "real" surrogate key.  If not one can see it,
how can you use it??

Charlotte Foust 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 2:44 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Surrogates vs Natural

Hi Marty and Arthur

I've found that you always should wear glasses when reading Joe's stuff.
But I think he is right here; what is the problem by switching from
10-digit UPC to 14-digit EAN numbers for retail articles?

And I guess this is nothing more than a typo:

".. never used in queries, DRI or anything else that a user does."

Should read:

".. never used in queries' resultsets, DRI or anything else that a user
does."

/gustav

>>> artful at rogers.com 28-12-2006 06:43 >>>
Joe and I have corresponded occasionally for several years. I deeply
respect his knowledge and depth but here and there I take issue with
him. This is one case in point.

Suppose that I create a table Sales with an Autonumber (or Identity if
in SQL). What is wrong with exposing this value to the user? Of course,
the front end should prevent editing of this value, but that is another
question. I do not see the problem with exposing the ANPK to the user.
It becomes the SalesID and the printout exposes it and the customer uses
this number when calling to question about the Sale. What is wrong with
that?

Maybe I'm missing something here, but I've been doing it this way for
20+ years and cannot recall a problem with it. 

I don't care about sequences without gaps. I don't care if you attempt
to insert then cancel 100 times in a row. Not my issue. But should you
insert and save and then print it (to PDF for email or whatever), then
the customer has a unique number to refer to this sale. I don't
understand why we should add a new number. What is wrong with the PK?
Granted, the systems should not allow this number to be edited, but
aside from that, what is the problem?

Arthur

----- Original Message ----
From: MartyConnelly <martyconnelly at shaw.ca>
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 5:12:19 PM
Subject: [AccessD] Surrogates vs Natural

A Bit More on Defining Keys
Joe Celko spouts off on one of the basics of database design.

This statement should set it off.

" This means that a surrogate ought to act like an index; created by the
user,"
managed by the system and NEVER seen by a user.  That means never used
in queries, DRI or anything else that a user does.
   Auto-numbering is an exposed physical locator and not a surrogate."