John Colby
jwcolby at ColbyConsulting.com
Fri Feb 3 12:54:47 CST 2006
>I really prefer to control it at the form by not allowing deletes there. If they can't delete it at the form level then Cascade Deletes never becomes an issue. And so I design a new form and forget to.... I am a VP and remoting in from home and build a query and... I am the power user and manage to get to the database window and... Your job is to outsmart the idiots. God's job is to design better idiots. Who has been on the job longer? The database engine has these things for a reason. You can't delete my client record I don't care WHAT you do, without deleting all child records first, in all child tables. Again, I don't care if you use them, I just care that you UNDERSTAND the consequences of using them. Lord knows if you don't have time to build a delete query and a button that only supervisors can get to, you don't have time to design an Active / trash system. Whatever you do, do NOT believe that backups can always rescue your young *ss. If some particularly smart idiot has been unknowingly deleting things over the last year, you will NEVER get all the records out of all the backup tapes. Understand the consequences, then make an informed decision. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Reuben Cummings Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:15 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Missing records Honestly, I'm not sold on Cascade Delete being off. It makes it much easier to work if it's on when record does require deletion (like your invoice example). I really prefer to control it at the form by not allowing deletes there. If they can't delete it at the form level then Cascade Deletes never becomes an issue. Reuben Cummings GFC, LLC 812.523.1017