John Colby
jwcolby at ColbyConsulting.com
Fri Jan 6 06:53:47 CST 2006
But was it an autonumber? I have seen integer/longs where you started placing values in the column and if the first two are consecutive, then Access places the third and subsequent values in there automatically as the next subsequent values. IOW, it is not an autonumber (which is an actual datatype) but rather just an int/long that happened to be incrementing. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Randall R Anthony Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:48 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] More Strange Autonumber Behavior - Access 2002 (aka Access XP) Sorry guys, I know what I saw and what fixed it. If it was some kind of anomally or what have you, so be it. >>> Gustav at cactus.dk 01/06/06 7:41 AM >>> Hi Branthon In Access 2.0 you cannot specify the AutoNumber/Counter to anything else than its native size (Long). /gustav >>> RRANTHON at sentara.com 06-01-2006 13:25 >>> You would force me to look it up. Access2.0. And in more than one instance. ee-eefff >>> Lambert.Heenan at aig.com 01/05/06 4:37 PM >>> In every version of Acces that I have used AutoNumber fields can be either Long Integers or Replication IDs. How could you have set one to an Integer? -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com