William Hindman
wdhindman at bellsouth.net
Wed Jan 11 21:35:42 CST 2006
...A2K3 with the SP doesn't appear to have the bloat problem. William ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002 > Definitely not. Our AXP apps use the 2000 format for all our datafiles. > Only the front end files are 2002 format. There are better arguments > for not migrating data to the 2002 or later formats, since they bloat > worse than 2000. > > Charlotte Foust > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Myke Myers > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:45 PM > To: 'Database Advisors' > Subject: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002 > > > I'm getting ready to upgrade a corporate client from Access 2000 to > Access 2002. > > The backend databases (tables and data only) that reside on the servers > are Access 2000. > > Is there any reason to import the data tables into an Access 2002 > database for the upgrade? > > TIA, > > Myke > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >