[AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002

William Hindman wdhindman at bellsouth.net
Wed Jan 11 21:35:42 CST 2006


...A2K3 with the SP doesn't appear to have the bloat problem.

William

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002


> Definitely not.  Our AXP apps use the 2000 format for all our datafiles.
> Only the front end files are 2002 format.  There are better arguments
> for not migrating data to the 2002 or later formats, since they bloat
> worse than 2000.
>
> Charlotte Foust
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Myke Myers
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:45 PM
> To: 'Database Advisors'
> Subject: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002
>
>
> I'm getting ready to upgrade a corporate client from Access 2000 to
> Access 2002.
>
> The backend databases (tables and data only) that reside on the servers
> are Access 2000.
>
> Is there any reason to import the data tables into an Access 2002
> database for the upgrade?
>
> TIA,
>
> Myke
>
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 





More information about the AccessD mailing list