[AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002

...the bloat was still there in A2K3 before the SP but apparently not after.

William

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access 2002


> Good to know.  I don't use 2003 and was repeating whata developer who
> does had told me.
>
> Charlotte Foust
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William
> Hindman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:36 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access
> 2002
>
>
> ...A2K3 with the SP doesn't appear to have the bloat problem.
>
> William
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend Database Format: Access 2000 vs Access
> 2002
>
>
>> Definitely not.  Our AXP apps use the 2000 format for all our
>> datafiles. Only the front end files are 2002 format.  There are better
>
>> arguments for not migrating data to the 2002 or later formats, since
>> they bloat worse than 2000.
>>
>> Charlotte Foust
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>