Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Jan 24 19:23:35 CST 2006
On 25 Jan 2006 at 11:13, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > The larger a number, the more weight it needs to carry in the "averaging" A > clearer example to show why you can't just average averages to get an > overall average. > OK, bad example. That's not exactly what you were doing. Here's a more relevant one: 1/100 = .01 9999/10000 = .9999 Weighted average: 10000/10100 = .9909 Average(?) average: (.01 + .9999)/2 = .50495 The 9999/10000 cases clearly needs to carry 100 time more "weight" that the 1/100 cases. -- Stuart