Kenneth Ismert
kismert at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 12 11:31:26 CDT 2006
William, Erwin: > ...and thus I would believe the imminent demise of vba is greatly > exaggerated. As much as I would like to agree, it just ain't so. VB6 will be gone in less than two years: Product Family Life-Cycle Guidelines for Visual Basic 6.0 http://msdn.microsoft.com/vbrun/support.aspx "Non-Supported Phase ... Visual Basic 6.0 will no longer be supported starting March 2008." VBA's fate is in grave doubt, too: Classic VB Petition FAQ http://classicvb.org/petition/faq.asp "... But, no development has occurred on the VBA IDE in over eight years; the team has been abandoned. New versions of Office continue, at this point, to ship with this very old technology." Does this look like a platform they plan to keep? >...and thus replacing [VBA] with VS.Net would be like replacing > Coca Cola Classic with new Coke ...the masses that feed the golden > goose would rebel... Funny you should mention that. The VB6 masses have already rebelled. Microsoft ignored them. See: Classic VB http://classicvb.org/ Do you think the current Office user base is sufficient deterrent against abandoning VBA? Don't be so sure. Microsoft walked away from 6 million VB programmers: ...The Disaster Known As Visual Basic http://www.bitwisemag.com/copy/bytegeist/bytegeist7.html Agreed, Microsoft is in a predicament with Office/VBA: Office and .NET: Better Together? http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2002_08/magazine/departments/guestop/default.aspx Although it will be painful for them, I feel the most likely scenario is that Microsoft will walk away from VBA 1-2 years after the Vista rollout, assuming it is successful. Their message to us, I feel, is clear: Change, or die. -Ken