Kenneth Ismert
kismert at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 12 11:31:26 CDT 2006
William, Erwin:
> ...and thus I would believe the imminent demise of vba is greatly
> exaggerated.
As much as I would like to agree, it just ain't so. VB6 will be gone in
less than two years:
Product Family Life-Cycle Guidelines for Visual Basic 6.0
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vbrun/support.aspx
"Non-Supported Phase ... Visual Basic 6.0 will no longer
be supported starting March 2008."
VBA's fate is in grave doubt, too:
Classic VB Petition FAQ
http://classicvb.org/petition/faq.asp
"... But, no development has occurred on the VBA IDE in over
eight years; the team has been abandoned. New versions of
Office continue, at this point, to ship with this very old
technology."
Does this look like a platform they plan to keep?
>...and thus replacing [VBA] with VS.Net would be like replacing
> Coca Cola Classic with new Coke ...the masses that feed the golden
> goose would rebel...
Funny you should mention that. The VB6 masses have already rebelled.
Microsoft ignored them. See:
Classic VB
http://classicvb.org/
Do you think the current Office user base is sufficient deterrent
against abandoning VBA? Don't be so sure. Microsoft walked away from 6
million VB programmers:
...The Disaster Known As Visual Basic
http://www.bitwisemag.com/copy/bytegeist/bytegeist7.html
Agreed, Microsoft is in a predicament with Office/VBA:
Office and .NET: Better Together?
http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2002_08/magazine/departments/guestop/default.aspx
Although it will be painful for them, I feel the most likely scenario
is that Microsoft will walk away from VBA 1-2 years after the Vista
rollout, assuming it is successful.
Their message to us, I feel, is clear: Change, or die.
-Ken