John Skolits
askolits at ot.com
Mon Jul 31 22:41:25 CDT 2006
Jim, I prefix all my library files with a "lbf_" (library file) prefix. This makes sure there is no confusion. You should come up with some kind of prefix of your own for library functions. John -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 7:11 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] duplicate function names This can be useful. You might have a 'generic' function in your library, but with some installations you need to do something a little different. With the function in the main database taking preference, you don't need to change the library. Dan Waters -----Original Message----- Subject: [AccessD] duplicate function names Maybe everyone but me knows this, but I just stumbled upon the fact that it is possible to have two functions with the same name coexist. If one is in a module in the current database and the other in a module in a referenced code library Access will use the function in the current database and ignore the version in the code library. Everything compiles and runs fine at least in access 2000. Whether or not this is useful or merely dangerous is a different question. Jim Hale -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com