[AccessD] Moving to SQL Server

MartyConnelly martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Wed Jun 14 13:08:21 CDT 2006


Try Erato she does Erotic Poetry.

Hale, Jim wrote:

>I'm tired of wizards. What I really need is a muse.
>Jim Hale
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Moss [mailto:jim.moss at jlmoss.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:36 PM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] Moving to SQL Server
>
>
>A wizard with a default selection that would allow the developer to
>override. The developer should be empowered to do their job which is
>develop.
>
>
>  
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I am working (sort of with) the development people for the new SQL Server
>>2005 Migration Assistant. Anyway. When moving queries etc to SQL Server
>>what server side objects should they be converted to
>>
>>Stored Procedures
>>Views
>>Passs Throughs
>>UDFs
>>
>>Or should the developer have the choice. Say a dialog which listed the
>>objects and allowed oyu to pick the most appropriate.
>>I am interesteed in teh real work developers do as the primary focus of
>>the assistant is developers.
>>
>>Would a wizartd driven interface help or would you prefer no wizard. If
>>there was a wizard would you want it to do the whole thing or just prepare
>>the databsae and then let you manually adjust things like queries and data
>>types?
>>
>>How would you like queries in form objects handled?
>>
>>So what do you think?
>>
>>All comments etc will be passed on to the development group.
>>
>>Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>Martin WP Reid
>>Training and Assessment Unit
>>Riddle Hall
>>Belfast
>>
>>tel: 02890 974477
>>
>>
>>--
>>AccessD mailing list
>>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Marty Connelly
Victoria, B.C.
Canada




More information about the AccessD mailing list