William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Sun Jun 25 21:50:15 CDT 2006
1) ...in a heartbeat (as long as I knew you had a decent editor) 2) ...I get by ...its easy to fool most of the people most of the time ...otherwise I beg for mercy here :) 3) ...reusable code approached as a topic in and of itself ...lots of hat tips toward it but no real down and dirty how-to ...frameworks are an extension of that ...I prefer "integrated library" but you like "framework" ...no matter, a coherent overview is what I expect to get along with some red meat. 4) ...both ...and sound examples of when and why either is best in specific circumstances ...I use bound as you know whenever I can ...but there are a number of situations where unbound is well worth the non-trivial extra work. 5) ...the guts of four applications from stem to stern (accounting, sales, pim, inventory) each done with the same framework as its heart ...using A2K7 of course ...and speaking of which, integration with sharepoint :) William ...take a deep breath JC ...you did ask :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "JWColby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 9:14 PM Subject: [AccessD] Would you buy > 1) If I were to write and get published (available at your local > bookstore) > a book on reusable code and frameworks, would you buy it? > > 2) What is your vba skill level? > > 3) What are your reasons for / against buying it? > > 4) Would you prefer bound or unbound forms? > > 5) What specific things would you like to see in the book? > > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >