A.D.TEJPAL
adtp at airtelbroadband.in
Thu Mar 30 13:24:28 CST 2006
Gustav,
I agree that "m/d/yyyyy" format for concatenation into a string should always give consistent results. Similar have been the findings with adoption of "dd-mmm-yyyy" format.
One advantage of non-ambiguous format is that even if the programmer happens to slip up from standard sequence, the result still gets interpreted correctly. For example, all the following permutations will work OK:
dd-mmm-yyyy, mmm-dd-yyyy, dd-yyyy-mmm, mmm-yyyy-dd, yyyy-mmm-dd, yyyy-dd-mmm.
Are you in a position to test out and verify whether there is any specific situation where non-ambiguous format represented by "dd-mmm-yyyy" is not found to give consistent results ? Do you have some language other than English in mind ?
Best wishes,
A.D.Tejpal
---------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Gustav Brock
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 23:48
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Date Comparison Problem
Hi A.D.
That may not work as the literal month names are localized as well.
/gustav
>>> adtp at airtelbroadband.in 30-03-2006 20:04 >>>
StrSQL = StrSQL & " WHERE TDate Between #" & _
Format(StartDate, "dd-mmm-yyyy") & "#"