[AccessD] To re-link or not to re-link...

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue May 16 10:12:22 CDT 2006


Thanks for the memory boost, Jim.  I knew I had encountered it but
couldn't remember the details. 


Charlotte

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:29 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] To re-link or not to re-link...

Charlotte,

  A2 had "attachment fatigue".  For no apparent reason, at some point,
linked tables would simply stop working.  A lot of developers got into
the habit of re-linking at startup every time.

  I myself check one table in each BE and if it can't open the table, I
force a re-link of all the tables associated with that BE.  I prompt the
user for the location of the BE to, so if it's been moved or it's
un-available, they can correct it.

Jim. 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte
Foust
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:40 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] To re-link or not to re-link...

It seems to me there were some issues in the early versions if the
linked database were not available (moved, renamed, network down)
because the condition seemed to persist even when the linked file became
available again, but I may be misremembering.  In any case, that was
overcome long ago and may have had more to do with the OS than with
Access itself. 


Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:09 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] To re-link or not to re-link...

Hi Bobby

We've never (since and including Access 2.0) seen any issues by _not_
relinking at every launch of the app.
That's for JET tables. Neither have I seen such a need for SQL Server.
It may be different for other (ODBC connected) engines though.

Why not just disable the relinking and watch what happens?

/gustav

>>> bheid at appdevgrp.com 15-05-2006 17:33 >>>
Hey,

We have a system that was originally developed in Access 97.  There were
a number of tables that were linked to the FE.  There were issues (not
sure what they were as no one remembers and I did not write the
original) with the system if the tables were not re-linked each time the
system is loaded.

Well, here we are today and the app has grown into Access XP.  The
system has grown and now has over 100 tables.  As such, it takes about
.6 seconds per table to re-link them all.  

Does anyone know what the issues may have been before and if they still
exist in Access XP?  Anyone have any pointers to further information?

Thanks,
Bobby


--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list