Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Sep 25 10:24:33 CDT 2006
Think of it like this: If you don't at least trap the error in the procedure where it occurs, how do you expect to get that information? Errors that are unhandled in a procedure bounce back up until they find an error handler. By that time, you have no idea where they originated, you only know what the error is. So even if you have a "global" error handler, you still need to trap errors in the procedure so you know where to look for the problem. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of artful at rogers.com Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 1:12 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Error Code Generator That was precisely my point. It seems the logical way to do it, but all the generators and the built-in stuff likes the local version. I don't get why that would be better. Given modern chip speed, it's obviously not about jumps. Maybe all the code does compress nicely but the local way seems so clumsy to me. ----- Original Message ---- From: DWUTKA at marlow.com To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 1:51:07 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Error Code Generator I do it the way you just mentioned. I have a global errorhandler, that receives the information I want to 'monitor' from each procedure. It saves time and space, and with a central point for errorhandling, I can force things pretty easily. (Record the errors in a db, shut the system down, etc.) Drew -----Original Message----- From: artful at rogers.com [mailto:artful at rogers.com] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:33 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Error Code Generator I didn't write it, but it raises a question that I have wondered about for a while. Why is it better to embed the error routine in the particular proc or func than to write one global error handler and pass it the text and perhaps the proc/func name, so there's only one error handler in the whole app? I never did understand this. Can anyone provide some insight? Arthur ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Reid <mwp.reid at qub.ac.uk> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 1:19:04 PM Subject: [AccessD] Error Code Generator I believe someone on the list created an error generator. I believe it might be JC? Anyway I have been using it a lot for code examples and just to be politically correct want the owner to know. Example below Function CopytoWss() On Error GoTo Err_CopytoWss DoCmd.SelectObject acTable, "Contacts" DoCmd.RunCommand acCmdExportSharePointList Exit_CopytoWss: Exit Function Err_CopytoWss: MsgBox Err.Description, , "Error in Function CopytoWss" Resume Exit_CopytoWss Resume 0 '.FOR TROUBLESHOOTING End Function Martin -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com