Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Apr 30 12:54:51 CDT 2007
Does it belong in this list? Also, there are differences between VS 2003 and VS 2005 when it comes to creating typed datasets. Charlotte -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:01 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] Dot Net, where to start? Hi Charlotte Yes, that sounds like a learning experience. /gustav >>> kp at sdsonline.net 30-04-2007 04:31 >>> Charlotte - any chance of stepping us dot net newbies thru an example of what you mean? Kath ----- Original Message ----- From: Charlotte Foust To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:18 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Dot Net, where to start? The chapters on ADO.Net give a good overview of datasets, data providers and the actual relational objects (tables, views, etc.), and it also compares ADO.Net and ADO as well. But I haven't seen any books describing the data tier structures in the way we built them. Most of the books start with directly binding a form to a data adapter, and we work the other way around. We build data "entities" that implement typed datasets and expose the behaviors and methods we need. We can then drop one of those entities on a form or report to provide the data connections we need. The working code is actually in a dataprovider class with the entity containing calls to the dataprovider and even to other entities if need be. Our model has evolved as we developed the apps and figured out what worked, and we have "refactored" (a much overused work in our shop) the bits and pieces many times over the course of the past two years. Charlotte Foust -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com