Michael R Mattys
mmattys at rochester.rr.com
Wed Aug 8 09:16:18 CDT 2007
Very nice and simple, Gustav. That's a keeper. :) Michael R. Mattys MapPoint & Access Dev www.mattysconsulting.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Question on order within a union query > Hi Tom > > Yes, include in each of the sections of the union query an expression to > sort on, like: > > SELECT 1 AS SortID, ... > UNION ALL > SELECT 2 AS SortID, ... > > Then Order By SortID as the first field and those fields, you currently > sort on, as the next field(s). > > /gustav > >>>> ewaldt at gdls.com 08-08-2007 15:45 >>> > I'm converting an Excel workbook to Access, to add functionality and > better ability for several people to use it at the same time. I've created > the tables, relationships, etc., with no problem. However, I would like > suggestions in one area. > > The user likes a spreadsheet report in the original workbook. I'd like to > imitate it for him within Access. This spreadsheet includes several lines > of data (easily duplicated within Access via query), the columns > subtotals, two more corresponding rows of data (i.e., the columns > correspond, but the rows are different), and a final totals line. > > I've put together all of the information via queries. I then combine the > queries via a union query, but it insists on mixing the lines together, > alphabetically, by the first column/field. I'm looking for a good way to > avoid this. Is there a key word, command, etc., to tell Access to leave > things in the order they're found? > > If not, do you have recommendations on how to achieve what I want in a > different way? > > TIA. > > Thomas F. Ewald > Stryker Mass Properties > General Dynamics Land Systems > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com