Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Dec 3 12:59:12 CST 2007
Yes, Drew, we get the picture. You're a devout anachronist! LOL Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Drew Wutka Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 9:24 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Interesting Laptop / Vista commentary Microsoft needs to do a paradigm shift. If we were to rate their OSes on a scale from 1 to 10 as far as improvements on previous OSes, here would be my list: Windows 95 - 8 Windows NT 4.0 - 9 Windows 98 - 3 Windows Me - -1 (yes, negative one) Windows 2000 - 10 Windows XP - 3 Windows 2003 - 3 Windows Vista - 2 95 was a tremendous paradigm shift in how we use a computer. It's interface is still in use in Windows Vista. Though it's much snazzier... but the core functionality of how a window works is there. NT 4, get's a 9, because it brought stability... 98....let's face it, the only real improvement was FAT32.... though there were a few more OS features (like sfc) Me... 98 with less features.... 2000, Microsoft's best product...EVER. (Tied with Microsoft Access 97, in my book). Rock solid, feature packed, user friendly, dynamic disks, Active Directory, the list goes on. XP, in my opinion, XP has two redeeming qualities. One, it takes the stability of 2000, and makes it look more consumer friendly like Windows 9x. Two, from a technical standpoint, the only feature I found handy in XP is than in Computer Management, you can select multiple file connections and close them at the same time... 2003, some nice new features, but still just building on the solid 2000 core. Vista.....what XP was to 2000, Vista is to XP...unimpressive. Drew