Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sun Dec 16 19:40:03 CST 2007
Hi Dan:
There are a number of options for positioning an element within a cell. I
know how to do it directly but not through VW. I would just go into the HTML
code and do it manually.
Within the TABLE tags:
Cellspacing and cellpadding
Within the TR, TD, DIV and SPAN tags (only align with DIV and SPAN tags)
Align = center, justify, left or right
Valign = baseline, bottom, middle or top
Then there are styles (or CSS) can be used with all the above tags.
Padding, margin can be used in a number of different ways.
Within any tag:
Style="padding: 5 5 5 5; or margin: 5 5 5 5;" <!-- can actually push
items with the tags outside the Tag area. Clockwise from 12 noon -->
Or
Style="padding-left: 15; or margin-left: 15"
Or
Style="margin: 0 0 -10 0;" <!-- can move position negatively -->
This is just the start. After that you can use CSS to float an element into
absolute of relative position:
<style>
.positionElement1 {
position: absolute; //relative
left: 25%; // 200px
top: 13%;
z-index: 1; // 65000+ levels
}
</style>
<div class="positionElement1">
...
</div>
or maybe use an old fashion spacing graphic to move an element to an exact
position.
There is much more than that but the above is a summary...
HTH
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:31 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
Well - I'm back to using Expression Web.
In VWD I never could figure out how to format a cell in a table -
specifically making vertical alignment = 'top'. I looked in VWD help - it
said that I could open the Cell Format dialog box by starting at the Layer
menu, then opening that dialog box from within the Table Format dialog box.
But there is no Layer menu that I could find, and the Table format dialog
box didn't reference the Cell Format dialog box. :-(!! Even if I just
missed it, it's a whole lotta clicks for a frequent activity.
In EW, it's just right-click in the cell and select Cell Properties.
So, for a web designer or a person new to web sites I have to recommend EW.
For a developer I would recommend VWD. For someone doing both, they can use
both programs for the same site (but I don't know if both can be open on the
same site at the same time).
Other than my not finding the Layer menu, it does look like most of the same
features exist in both sites - except that the Toolbox in VWD has a
staggering number of choices.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William Hindman
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
...the move from FP to Expression Web was effortless ...a few bots were
lost, including the nav bot Drew likes, but they were more than made up for
by the asp.net d&d controls ...and there are plug-ins to restore the old
bots as well ...but once into asp.net you won't want to.
...VS8 WDE is FP/Expression Web on steroids ...with so much more available
for developers its like night and day.
...your sister in law could use any of them equally well ...in either
program she would want to make sure her web developer had designed her site
using a DWT so that she could only edit the content areas she should be in
and not anything that would damage the site itself ...if she decides to use
the free VS8 WDE, she'll work almost always in design mode whereas any
developer would be working the same page in source view mode.
...as Dan pointed out MS has made a slew of free video tutorials available
targeted specfically at beginners that walk you through a lot of How Do I...
tasks.
...its hard for me to visualize a reason for anyone to be using FP,
Expression ...or Asp/VB ...any longer considering the price of VS8 WDE
...and as far as Drew's points re overhead, I did a site in Asp/VBScript and
then redid it in Asp.net/VB.net and the net results were both dramatically
faster AND a good bit smaller, content for content ...yes, there is the net
framework but so what? ...the contents of that framework and the object
inheritence that just "happens" dramatically reduce the amount of code you
have to write and the add-ons necessary to produce a site that is fast,
functional, and user friendly compared to ASP Classic ...imnsho of course :)
...my only regret is that I let the object/inhertance jargon scare me off
jumping into asp.net/vb.net/c#.net a long time ago ...but when MS put the
Express versions of VS5 out there for free, I just couldn't help myself
...besides which I'd already ran into a wall with the limitations of
Expression Web.
...my 2 cents, worth what it cost you ...others will certainly differ ...in
this group, thats a given :)
William
----- Original Message -----
From: "jwcolby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'"
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
> My sister-in-law Katie in Rochester, NY has hired this retired guy that
> does
> computer instruction for older people, quite the niche market. Anyway,
> Katie is retired from teaching and has opened a consulting business. This
> guy is helping her set up a web site using Front Page, because he knows
> that
> and because (he claims) the user can use FP to modify things themselves.
> thus he will show her how to use FP, help her get the web site hosted and
> running, and then she can do stuff herself, and he can help if she runs
> into
> trouble.
>
> Now I used FP back in the early 2000s and didn't much like it, but I
> imagine
> it has come a long ways since then and maybe it is a good answer for this
> scenario. Katie is NOT a computer person, though certainly not computer
> illiterate.
>
> I do not do web page stuff as anyone who has seen my site knows. Mine is
> DotNetNuke based precisely because I can at least just edit text to add
> stuff to the page.
>
> So for Katie, what is recommended? Is Expression as easy but more
> powerful?
> I can get ahold of her mentor to nudge him in that direction, but in the
> end
> Katie wants to be able to do the simple stuff herself.
>
> John W. Colby
> Colby Consulting
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 8:54 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
>
> This is Just In Time!
>
> I was going to spend the day doing some web site work, so I'll try it out
> in
> WDE instead.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William Hindman
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:55 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
>
> Dan
>
> Expression Web is the official successor to Front Page ...but with the
> release of VS8 WDE there is no longer any reason for anyone who writes
> code
> to use Expression ...VS8 WDE is free, has incorporated the CSS designer
> from
>
> Expression, adds more data controls, and offers so many, many other
> features
>
> Expression lacks ...I still have Expression installed but haven't used it
> since installing VS8.
>
> William
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Waters" <dwaters at usinternet.com>
> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'"
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
>
>
>> Also,
>>
>> MS Expression Web is a successor to FrontPage. If you have FP you
>> qualify
>> for 'upgrade' pricing to Expression Web - I paid about $90.
>>
>> To the user it 'feels like' FrontPage, but it does support asp.net.
>> Expression Web leans more to the Designer side, while Web Developer
>> Express
>> leans more to the Developer side. You can work on the same site with
>> both
>> programs if that turns out to be helpful.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William
>> Hindman
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:15 PM
>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
>>
>> ...sigh ...shakes head ...Asp and Front Page are dead ...long replaced by
>> Asp.Net and Visual Studio Web Designer Express Version 8, both of which
>> are
>> free, easier to use, and incredibly more capable.
>>
>> William
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Drew Wutka" <DWUTKA at marlow.com>
>> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
>> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 1:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: FrontPage Websites
>>
>>
>>> Ok, here's the first of the two classes in my SiteNav2006.dll. There is
>>> also a module, for my DBConnect function, which just sets the
>>> ADODB.Connection argument to a new ADODB.Connection, set's it's provider
>>> to Jet 4.0, then sets the extended proprerty for the workgroup file and
>>> opens the secured database.
>>>
>>> This is the Node Class:
>>>
>>> Option Explicit
>>> Public ID As Long
>>> Public ParentID As Long
>>> Public URL As String
>>> Public Title As String
>>> Public RootNode As Boolean
>>> Dim MyNodes As Collection
>>> Private Sub Class_Initialize()
>>> Set MyNodes = New Collection
>>> End Sub
>>> Property Get ChildCount() As Long
>>> ChildCount = MyNodes.Count
>>> End Property
>>> Friend Function AddChild(nd As Node)
>>> MyNodes.Add nd
>>> End Function
>>> Property Get ChildNode(intPos As Long) As Node
>>> Set ChildNode = MyNodes(intPos)
>>> End Property
>>> Public Function NewEnum() As IUnknown
>>> Set NewEnum = MyNodes.[_NewEnum]
>>> End Function
>>>
>>> My next email will have the Nodes class. The code is a little long, so
>>> I'm crossing my fingers that it will post. In the RetrieveNavigation
>>> Function, I will put '''Customization Starts here for where this
>>> function starts mixing the FP navigation with the product database for
>>> our site, so that wouldn't have to be included in someone elses...but
>>> I'm keeping it in there to show how you can tweak the navigation to
>>> include custom dynamic pages.
>>>
>>> Drew
>>>
>>> --
>>> AccessD mailing list
>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>> --
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com