[AccessD] Missing references

<<Is this verifiable,>>

  Pretty much yes.  As I said to John, it depends on the mix of operations
that you are performing.  But in all cases it is faster without a doubt.
It's just a matter of how much.  From past timings that I did, I found as a
general rule of thumb that it was a 10% - 15% overall difference in speed.

<<Is this a thumbnail calculation or can you supply concrete arithmetical
evidence?>>

  I did this years ago and have always used early binding as a result
whenever possible.  If I use late binding, I put it in the spec and note
that it is a performance drain.

  So I'll use late if I have to, but I don't like it<g>

Jim. 



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of artful at rogers.com
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Missing references

Is this verifiable, Jim? I haven't ever used late-binding, which I admit has
caused various installation issues, but I am curious. Is this a thumbnail
calculation or can you supply concrete arithmetical evidence?

A.



----- Original Message ----
From: Jim Dettman <jimdettman at verizon.net>
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 9:49:44 AM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Missing references


Bryan,

  One thing you didn't mention is the performance hit; late binding costs
you 10-15% for every operation perform.

Jim.
-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com