Steve Schapel
miscellany at mvps.org
Sat Jul 14 16:44:53 CDT 2007
Indoctrination in the evils of storing redundant data has thus far prevented me from considering this option, A.D., but I agree that it is a good solution, and a reminder that rules are to be interpreted flexibly. Regards Steve A.D.TEJPAL wrote: > Apparently the hidden bound text box used for storing date stamp is > meant to act as a slave to the check box in question. This would > imply that the contents of this text box are not to be disturbed > unless there is user action on the check box. Is this correct ? > > If so, would it not be convenient to make the check box also a bound > one ? AfterUpdate event of the check box should then be the most > suitable event for placing Steve's code, and as already indicated by > him, no code should be needed anywhere else.