Dian
nd500_lo at charter.net
Sun Jun 24 14:54:29 CDT 2007
Well, I already admitted I was grumpy. I think that, if I had the time (and the inclination)to do what I did originally (learn Access 2.0, which was then brand-new), it might work. I don't think I want to go that far right now and so I'm cheating (and I'll understand if you all want to throw me off the list permanently for this one). I'm doing all the upgrades in 2003, then I'll convert it and smile sweetly and cash the check. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 12:38 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Office 2007 The alleged improvements seem without exception to dazzle all Office users who have never sniffed a line of code. I must be old-fangled -- I cannot yet deem one reason why "ribbons" are better than the menubar; nor can I find menu items that I used to be able to find eyes-closed. Apparently somebody has released an add-in that puts the classic menu back into the picture while hiding the ribbons. On the plus side, I really do love the navigation bar in Access 2007. Arthur On 6/24/07, Dian <nd500_lo at charter.net> wrote: > > Odd you should ask that. Although I'm technically retired, I had a > request to upgrade the first app I ever did...and I started on it > yesterday. So far, all I can say is that it was easier to work in > Access 2.0 than to upgrade to 2007. I can also say that I wish MS > would just give us good stuff and leave all the new interface > improvements OUT of the mix. Yeah...I'm grumpy right now. >