Dian
nd500_lo at charter.net
Sun Jun 24 22:01:04 CDT 2007
I not only remember WordStar, I still miss it sometimes when I want to do something fancy and can't remember how to make it happen. WordStar didn't do all that much, but what it did looked great....and it was SIMPLE...seems like nothing is simple today... -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 2:36 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Office 2007 Just remember when you cash that cheque, you come see me, Tony Soprano, with a slice. Whoa! I just remembered, I actually do own the name MobStar! Bought it on a lark, and you'd have to be old to understand why (Wordstar etc.) but I scored that name a long time ago. I used it in various presentations, because most such are very dry, so I chose to go in the Tony Soprano software vein -- yous gotyas pharmatceutical and companionship and and risk modules, plus yous gotta move girls from here to there so they don't get stale, and yous got "break arms or legs or both" reports. This business is tough. Add on encryption and I definitely don't want my wives or partners to be able to read the data. I've thought about this, but at the end of the day, what caused me to pass is the tech-support part of the equation. 3am: "Yo, Arthur, we got a shoe ovah heah. You gotta wipe this like a newborn baby. I mean clean." Although I detected a significant market here, ultimately I chose to pass. Several bikers arrive at your home at 3am and point out that's there's a bug in your routine xxyyzz. No thanks! So there you go. On a lark, I bought the name MobStar. Now I'm afraid to sell it. LOL. A. On 6/24/07, Dian <nd500_lo at charter.net> wrote: > > Well, I already admitted I was grumpy. I think that, if I had the time > (and the inclination)to do what I did originally (learn Access 2.0, > which was then brand-new), it might work. I don't think I want to go > that far right now and so I'm cheating (and I'll understand if you all > want to throw me off the list permanently for this one). I'm doing all > the upgrades in 2003, then I'll convert it and smile sweetly and cash > the check. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur > Fuller > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 12:38 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Office 2007 > > The alleged improvements seem without exception to dazzle all Office > users who have never sniffed a line of code. I must be old-fangled -- > I cannot yet deem one reason why "ribbons" are better than the > menubar; nor can I find menu items that I used to be able to find > eyes-closed. > > Apparently somebody has released an add-in that puts the classic menu > back into the picture while hiding the ribbons. > > On the plus side, I really do love the navigation bar in Access 2007. > > Arthur > > > On 6/24/07, Dian <nd500_lo at charter.net> wrote: > > > > Odd you should ask that. Although I'm technically retired, I had a > > request to upgrade the first app I ever did...and I started on it > > yesterday. So far, all I can say is that it was easier to work in > > Access 2.0 than to upgrade to 2007. I can also say that I wish MS > > would just give us good stuff and leave all the new interface > > improvements OUT of the mix. Yeah...I'm grumpy right now. > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com