Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Wed Mar 28 11:59:55 CDT 2007
Boy have I heard that one before and seen it too! Government IT departments like applications they can control to a fare-thee-well and are highly suspicious of anything a user can understand and might be tempted to play with or (horrors!) ask questions about why it works that way. Never mind that the apps in question take many times as long to build and have outrageous price tags--you get what you pay for, right? Large corporations often fall into the same trap, throwing bad money after good because they need "real" applications ... That IT can lock down to prevent ... Etc., etc. Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:48 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] I can't Believe this Hi Bryan: <Wednesday rant mode> Be careful on the number of lines of code in MS Access. The last major provincial government application that I created was deemed too complex to support, with too many users and with using 'non-standard deployment of technology' but the clients were very pleased with the programs performance. To the chagrin of the department, the application was rebuilt using Oracle forms with an Oracle DB and with a 700,000 dollar price tag. The department was upset when that version proved too slow, too awkward to use and with too few features. It is now being rebuilt again, by another company, at another huge price tag, in Oracle. ... (If I knew management wanted to throw tax-payers money away I could have rebuilt my application twice at half the price.) </Wednesday rant mode off> Anyway I have been getting some good contract work as compensation from the local department management, so I guess I should not complain.... too much. MS Access seems to have a bad rap, especially with our provincial government. It appears that your federal government department is more enlightened. Now that felt good getting that off my chest. :-) Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Bryan Carbonnell Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:36 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: [AccessD] I can't Believe this I can believe this. I have been asked to supply to IT, information on the custom Word, Excel and Powerpoint templates we use regularly. That was fairly simple. Only 8 total with less than 500 lines of code combined. However, I also sent info off about our primary Access DBs. One of them has over 10K lines of code, 60 queries, 40 table. Another has almost 15k lines of code. I couldn't believe that those DBs had that much code. I knew I worte a lot, but didn't think that it was that much. All I can say is thank goodness for MZTools and it's statistics. I'd hate to count that many lines of code by hand. -- Bryan Carbonnell - carbonnb at gmail.com Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "What a great ride!" -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com