JWColby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu May 3 07:57:49 CDT 2007
>I like it because then I can stop trying to remember what app I wrote a given function in. When starting a new app, I usually load CodeLib and then copy in several standard modules. I hate to hammer on this over and over, but that is what a library is for. Did you know that when Windows XP shipped it had SIXTY THOUSAND known bugs and (more importantly) an unknown number of unknown bugs. In order to fix these bugs what does MS do? Updates. What do updates do? Install a new "library" with bug fixes. Can you imagine Microsoft having to rifle through your installation of windows looking for the lines of code that have a bug that they just fixed and fixing it everywhere on 200 million computers? It is a silly concept and we all know that. I am sure that you are convinced that you have no bugs in your code, but statistics say 1 in 20 lines of code has a bug. This can be something gross such as never ending loop (which we mostly find immediately and fix) to something subtle like loss of data from a type conversion or something. By cutting and pasting your code, you cut and paste your bugs. NOW you have to remember what apps you cut and pasted bugs into! A referenced library allows you to fix a bug and simply insert that fixed library into the project. Since all your projects use your lib, all your projects get your bug fixes when you insert a new lib. I make it a policy that all GENERIC code goes in my library. All project specific code goes in the project. If it is not used anywhere else then it obviously does not belong in my library, however if it is going to be used in any other project then it does belong in my library. Libraries guys, NOT cut and paste modules. And sorry Arthur, I am not picking on you. I see LOTS of people talking about "cutting and pasting" into their projects. That is simply a no-no in modern system design. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:05 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Inc. Sourcebook It's something that came with the Office Developer's Toolkit and also with Visual Studio 6. It has a library of routines grouped around topics like DAO and ADO and so on. It can contain code snippets or procs/funcs and entire modules, too. I like it and still use it. Over the years my own CodeLib library has swelled to contain a few hundred functions etc. I like it because then I can stop trying to remember what app I wrote a given function in. When starting a new app, I usually load CodeLib and then copy in several standard modules. hth, Arthur On 5/3/07, Sad Der <accessd666 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Charlotte, > > what's the MS CodeLibrarian. Found some articles on the internet about > it but not much. What is this thing? > > Thanks In Advance! > > Sander > > --- Charlotte Foust <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> > wrote: > > > I had the 97 and 2000 versions of their sourcebook and never thought > > it was worth the price. The .Net product may be better, but I > > wouldn't count on that. I generally copy and paste my own code from > > the MS CodeLibrarian or something similar, when I'm not scavenging > > for ways to do something totally unfamiliar. > > > > Charlotte Foust