JWColby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu May 3 12:08:07 CDT 2007
>I wasn't making excuses for anything, John. >I agree with you about libraries in principle, but when you build something that works one-off, you stuff the code into Code Librarian as a template in case you need to do something similar. It's very handy for reference instead of trolling the internet for hours looking for the right example. I don't know about you, but I'm not omniscient enough to know that *this precise version of a routine* belongs in a library so I can use it over and over. I generally wait until the usefulness is clear before I start building libraries. Also, libraries in Access can be a pain when you have to distribute them, since they don't compile into a dll. If your library gets deleted, you are SOL. And since libraries should be mdes, every time you "update" one, you have to rebuild it. Hmm... OK, I INTERPRET these as excuses for using cut and paste. Now tell me what they REALLY are? There is absolutely nothing in that whole paragraph that validates cutting and pasting potentially bug infected code into an application when such code should be in a library, but that paragraph was sent in response to my pointing out the problems with cut and paste. ;-) >You use uncompiled libraries and I don't. Using a compiled library is fine by me, I just don't. In the Access environment it causes more problems than it fixes (as you so nicely pointed out). >You're persuaded your way is right and I'm not. My way of doing what? If you are talking about libraries vs. cut and paste, then yep, I am convinced that "my" way is right. So is the industry. In fact it is not my way at all, I just do what I do because it makes sense to do that. As I said before, I did not invent this stuff, libraries existed while I was still in diapers. Well.... OK, while I was still in grade school. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:37 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Inc. Sourcebook I wasn't making excuses for anything, John. That was your interpretation. You use uncompiled libraries and I don't. You're persuaded your way is right and I'm not. ;-> Charlotte Foust