jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Mon May 14 12:30:30 CDT 2007
I am not sure whether this is true or not but I have always felt that I do not have the same level of security issues that others might. I am a one man shop. All of my systems run on a LAN behind a router. No one routinely remotes in to my system, I don't publish a web page (through the firewall out to the web), I run software firewalls on all machines etc. If I were going to take your advice, which I might, I would probably set up one of my older machines as my personal workstation kind of machine. With everything on a single small lan, I actually use a kvm switch to switch between up to 4 systems so it is simple to switch back and forth between boxes. I can also use remote desktop if I want to to get at each box. Having Server 2003 running on the big boxes means I can actually have the desktop showing on the monitor and remote in from my laptop (for example) to another instance of the same user, or even another user. Remote desktop across a local LAN is just as fast as live. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Francisco Tapia Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:15 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] VB.Net - seeing the messagebox That is true John, but you ought to consider running your VS on an XP box to help avoid other security issues from 2003. 2003 is an excellent OS and one that we had not had many issues with, however I don't use this OS for anything other than a strict Server OS. That means nothing that is not Server related, (Sql 2000/2005 only). One thing you can consider is to install VMware Server (free copy) and use a product like VMware Converter (also free) to create an XP OS on your server. You can then install VS on there and run it on one of the cores for your 64 server. (choose 1 instead of two so that you can allow the Sql server to utilize as much CPU as needed for cpu intensive process. Also place the Virtual Disks on a disk not utilized by your sql server, I remember you had segregated everything... even a Usb2.0 drive will help here, where you install your vmware machine to that usb2.0 drive to help maintain performance on the vmware machine and not take any away from your sql server functions (such as those required for the high intensive reads, ie, imports/exports). my two cents (both the products I mentioned are provided free of charge from Vmware) -- Francisco