Andy Lacey
andy at minstersystems.co.uk
Wed May 16 02:26:10 CDT 2007
You have a point Jim of course, and perhaps the BOD should discuss the structure of the lists. In the meantime a moderator can only moderate what's there. We're pretty tolerant but until the BOD decide otherwise AccessD is primarily for Access stuff. As I say, we're pretty tolerant, and if someone tries to get an answer on another list and comes to AccessD as a last resort because of its wider membership, well fine, I've done it myself, we won't complain. We're just asking tht people try the appropriate list first. -- Andy Lacey http://www.minstersystems.co.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > Jim Lawrence > Sent: 15 May 2007 21:39 > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] From your friendly moderator > > > I agree that the borders between the various lists have been > criss-crossed as many have been using the shot-gun approach > to ask and answer questions. > > On the other hand much of the newer technology is morphing > and the strict borders are no longer realistic. Example the > Access list looks more like the 'Access.Net using SQL 2005' > list. No longer does Access just use the MDB database and > eventually SQL DB with .Net/Framework/Mono calls will become > fully incorporated. > > Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > Francisco Tapia > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:48 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] From your friendly moderator > > Well said! > > > On 5/14/07, Andy Lacey <andy at minstersystems.co.uk> wrote: > > > > We seem to have let our standards slip recently regarding posting > > topics to the appropriate lists, and regarding cross-posting. Can I > > just remind everyone that we have a specific SQL-Server > list, one for > > VB, one for Visio, > > a dba-Tech list for other IT matters, and an OT list for > non-IT matters > > (see > > http://www.databaseadvisors.com/lists/whatandhow.asp )? > Please make more > > use > > of these other lists and try to limit AccessD to Access > stuff. I know that > > AccessD is the main list, but SQLServer and VB particularly > have many > > members and are specifically geared to answering questions on those > > topics. > > If you have a question which belongs on one of the other > lists I urge you > > to > > please post it on the appropriate list first. If you don't get the > > response > > you're after and believe that reposting to AccessD will help then of > > course > > you're going to, but you should then append "(originally posted to > > dba-xx)" > > to your subject. This will help people who have already > seen the original. > > It may even encourage wider membership of the other lists. > Please avoid > > the > > scatter-gun approach of just posting the same question > straight away to > > all > > of the lists. This generates wasted bandwidth, is a > particular irritant > > for > > those on multiple lists and uses up storage in our archive. > Many thanks > > for > > your co-operation. > > > > -- Andy Lacey > > http://www.minstersystems.co.uk > > > > > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > -- > -Francisco > http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More... > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >