Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Thu May 17 14:44:04 CDT 2007
Hi Marty: Thanks for the tip. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of MartyConnelly Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:58 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT AJAX question Just remember for international web apps charset=iso-8859-1 will only work for the Americas and Western Europe, someone from Russia whose Windows codepage is iso-8859-5 will get funny looking characters due to wrong transliteration of characters. So you might want to keep UTF-8 even though 3 bytes are sent for every character representation. I noticed that even Google Desktop Search Engine hadn't taken this into consideration with their returned XML. Jim Lawrence wrote: >Hi Marty and anyone else interested: > >The solution to the AJAX invalidly encoded return data has been solved. It >appears that any data returned from a source must have a header supplied. >The caller reads this first and sets the configuration appropriately. > >But that the first returning data (first line) must set the encoding. In the >event of an ASP server page the first line might be something like: > >Response.AddHeader "Content-type", "text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" > >...or PHP like: >header("Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"); > >...or when any type of transaction takes place between a server and client >an appropriate header must be supplied. When an ASP.Net server script is >serving a PDF file: > >Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "inline; filename=mydocument.pdf") > >..or initiate data Report: > >response.addheader("Content-Disposition", inline; filename=Report"); > >... or set up for receiving XML data: > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >It all seems very obvious now. Hope this helps someone who is thinking of >working with AJAX or extensively with Server/Client applications. > >Jim > >-----Original Message----- >From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of MartyConnelly >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:18 PM >To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT AJAX question > >I would have to see the Javascript that is doing this > >Generally this would be set in the encoding parameter of the XML >PI Processing instruction, there are about 30 of these some dependant >on the Windows codepage. SQL Server or Access punts it out in UTF-8 even >without >including a PI. There are ways to transliterate between encodings using ADO >streams. It can also be determined by the BOM marker at the start of >the file. > >In your case for Unicode encoding, you would want something like >this XML PI > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >http://www.geocities.com/pmpg98_pt/CharacterEncoding.html >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q275883/ > > >XML Encodings > >MSXML supports all encodings that are supported by Microsoft Internet >Explorer. >Internet Explorer's support depends on which language packs are installed >on the computer; this information is stored under the following registry >key: >HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\MIME\Database\Charset > >xml example > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> ><character> > <chr>í</chr> ></character> ><!-- ISO-8859-1 encoded (Windows Code Page 1252?) --> ><!-- It must have the correct encoding declaration --> ><!-- The special char will display correctly on system that suport that >codepage --> > >Jim Lawrence wrote: > > >>OT AJAX >> >>Hi all: >> >>This question is totally off-topic but the list members here have an >>incredible berth and depth of knowledge and I am sure someone will know or >>know where to look. >> >>For anyone here that has worked with AJAX/XML by default the information >>coming back from the server only supports 128 bit ASCII. That is great for >>straight English but any other single byte language, 256 bits is a minimum. >> >>Has anyone ran across a solution or knows where to find a solution? If so >>many thanks is advance. (...have researched a number of potential solutions >>but have been unable to either get them to work or have them fall-over with >>one client or another.) >> >>Jim >> >> -- Marty Connelly Victoria, B.C. Canada -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com