Tina Norris Fields
tinanfields at torchlake.com
Wed Oct 24 16:34:50 CDT 2007
John, Thanks for your thoughtful and informative discussion. Best regards, Tina jwcolby wrote: > Greg, > > I was a (volunteer) firefighter up in Connecticut and completed the > Firefighter 1 training (required to go inside burning buildings). I also > lived in San Marcos for 15 years (1980-1995) before moving on. While you > are correct in everything you say it still doesn't paint the full picture. > > The shake shingle roofs which were quite common on the houses built in the > 70s and 80s will catch fire from embers landing on the roofs. If these > shingles are old and untreated they will catch fairly rapidly and once a > patch of roof is engulfed no garden hose will put it out. A fully engulfed > home can and will catch the house next door and in fact entire neighborhoods > can go very quickly. People caught in those situations can quite easily > die. Fires blown by high winds can "jump" hundreds of yards or even miles > (in brush). In fact this is exactly how they jump the freeways which you > would think would act as natural firebreaks and create natural boundaries; > They can but all too often do not because of the winds. Thus a single house > on fire can "cause" another house hundreds of yards away to burn. > > Watch the TV. A full fire crew CANNOT EXTINGUISH a fully engulfed home fire > with entire engines available to them, all they can do is control and wet > down the adjacent buildings to prevent the spread. > > Trained firemen die every year (encased in full on fire gear) because they > get caught in the middle of a fire when the fire jumps over them and catches > the brush around them. In fact firemen fighting brush fires are often > provided "solar blankets" which can SOMETIMES save their lives by allowing > them to hide under these blankets if they do get caught in a fire. > > I have never been inside of a real live burning structure but I have done > the training with air packs and fire suits, going into training buildings > with real fires (and LOTS of smoke) and even with suits designed to > withstand 600 degree heat it is HOT and you can't see 2 inches in front of > your face. Unprotected civilians in a fully engulfed burning neighborhood > will die, if not from the flames and heat, then from smoke inhalation or > even heart attacks. > > Evacuating a million people is the exact right thing to do rather than lose > lives. Even worse is to lose firefighters trying to rescue the idiots that > want to try and save their homes and get caught behind the fire line. A > single house burning is nothing to mess with, a brush fire or an entire > burning neighborhood whipped up by high winds can turn deadly in seconds, > even for trained professionals. > > It is easy to criticize the effects of evacuations but in fact people die > from these fires every year because they refuse to leave and try to save > their home with garden hoses. Personally I don't mind if idiots die > (cleansing the gene pool) but I object to firefighters dying trying to > rescue the idiots. > > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > www.ColbyConsulting.com > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Greg Worthey > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:14 PM > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: [AccessD] Perspective on So Cal fires 2007 > > I live in san diego. > > Facts on the So Cal fires: > - has affected about 640 square miles (410,000 acres) so far. > - 1,000,000 people have been forcibly evacuated (last number I heard for San > Diego county was 513,000, yesterday) > - most of those people were ordered to leave by an automated recording, > several miles in advance of any possible fire path. This "perfect storm", in > fact, came nowhere near 99% of their homes. > - 1,250 homes have been destroyed; half that from the 2003 fires > - information about the size and location of the fires remains wildly fuzzy > at best. Best mapped info is here: > http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/kml/conus.kmz (note: you need google earth) > - while a million people are forced to sit in parking lots and auditoriums > (as if panic were called for), only about 1000 people in all of so cal are > fighting fires (as if no one could help) > - Planes were scooping water from the pacific ocean to drop on Malibu, tout > suite, by early Monday morning. As of Wednesday morning, officials are still > TALKING about doing the same here. It has nothing to do with wind > conditions; same lie they used 4 years ago. > > > While it's depicted on the news as a wild inferno racing to wipe out the > western seaboard, the reality is that it's mostly low brush fires in scantly > covered (semi-desert) unpopulated areas. It's a tragedy for wildlife, but > mostly it's just insane overreaction (and underreaction) re people. The news > picks the most impressive clips (i.e. a house or patch of trees in inferno), > rather than the prevalent lowscale desert brush fire, and loops that image > over and over. Most of the 1,000,000 people evacuated were in no danger at > all. > > Most of the 1200 houses were randomly hit (i.e. one destroyed, while > neighbors were untouched). This indicates that in many cases a person with a > garden hose could have put out the incipient fires on the spot, before they > consumed anything and grew. Not in all cases, of course, but when an ember > hits, it's going to start a SMALL fire, and a quick garden hose can put it > out (whereas a firetruck hours later can only try to calm the all-consuming > inferno). > > So not only did this new "reverse 911 system" massively inconvenience and > frighten a MILLION people, and nearly shut down the whole county, it also > removed all witnesses to small brush fires becoming infernos due to the fact > that no one was there to do the least thing to prevent spreading to big fuel > (ie. trees and houses). > > Insanity. Kind of like dutifully confiscating toothpaste and nail clippers, > while allowing 75% of bombs through airport security. > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >