Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Mon Oct 29 12:16:13 CDT 2007
Hi John: Other than it is the SLOWEST, most resource hungry query there is in the world of SQL and even running a 'loop' usually is significantly faster. In one particular situation when adding a huge amount of data, to a table, creating a unique key (also not usually recommended when adding large amounts of data) and testing for data collision errors produced a superior result. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 7:16 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: [AccessD] "Not In" query speed Does anyone have any information on the speed of a "not in" query? That is where an outer join to a table is used and then a filter set on the PK (or any field really) of the outer joined table to discover all records "not in" the outer joined table? Is the speed the same as an inner join would have been? Is there more overhead because of the where clause? In other words, assume a table where there are 50K claim records in tblClaim. Assume that there are 25K records in TblClaimLogged (exactly 1/2 the number of records in tblClaim) and that each ClaimID is only in tblClaimLogged one time. Now do an inner join to discover which records are IN tblClaimLogged. Now do an outer join to discover which records are NOT IN tblClaimLogged. Both queries should return exactly 25K records since exactly 1/2 of the records in tblClaim are in tblClaimLogged, and each record can only be in there once. Do the two queries return the result sets in the same amount of time? John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com