Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Sep 27 02:55:54 CDT 2007
Hi Charlotte So do I, but in C# a similar construct does not exist and I really don't understand why - if you don't like that construct you could just choose not to use it. /gustav >>> cfoust at infostatsystems.com 27-09-2007 02:07 >>> I use With...End With all the time in .Net because I'm working with things like the current row of a dataset, or the cells of a grid, or some such, and I can still use intellisense once I've created the With ... End With shell. In a complicated routine, why not reduce some of the references you have to read?? Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Michael Maddison Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 5:05 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Friday fun: Lambda Expressions Absolutely correct. I have not found myself missing With... , with Intellisense you generally only have to type the first character or 2 anyway. I had to do some maint programming in VB6 this week and it just felt clunky. The only feature I miss is being able to break into the code from a MessageBox [CTL+Break]. Is there some shortcut I'm missing? cheers Michael M Hi Gustav, Thank you for your clarifications. <<< I miss the With .. End With constructs but that's it. >>> I'd bet you'll quickly forget about 'With ... End With' block and what for it was needed when you'll see how "smart" VS2005 IDE's Intellisense is for C#... -- Shamil