Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sat Aug 16 10:49:09 CDT 2008
Hi Borge: Having done contracts for both the federal and provincial governments for years there are only two acceptable date display methods. There has been just too much confusion in the past. 1. yyyy mm dd ie. 20080821 or 2008/08/21 (SI standard) 2. dd Mmm yyyy ie. 21 Aug 2008 Both above methods will never cause errors like methods of 5/8/2008 will. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Borge Hansen Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 1:06 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: [AccessD] SQL 2005 - disambiguous DateTime format Hi all, I SQL 2005 I have adopted to routine of always passing a DateTime format for whatever purpose in the format of a string: YYYY-MM-DD in order to be sure that the date is interpreted correctly irrespective of locale setting of the computer Now some colleagues are telling me to use format DD-MMM-YYYY is the -only- safe way. I would think that both methods of passing a date would be -safe- (To avoid misinterpretation of 4/8/2008 - is it 4 August 2008 or 8 April 2008?) Any pointers to KB article or other than explains this in more detail? Regards Borge -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com