Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 11:59:41 CST 2008
That is a total cinch, Rocky. Just back it up, then copy the backup file to a CD or memory stick and go to the site, then do a restore on the site. If the db doesn't exist on the site, just choose any db in the list and select Tasks|Restore. When the property sheet comes up, change the name of the db to what you want and check the path of the files to be restored so it makes sense on the site. Presto, you're done. A. On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software < rockysmolin at bchacc.com> wrote: > Gustav: > > How do I transfer the SQL db from here to there? > > Rocky > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:59 AM > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: Re: [AccessD] SQL vs Access > > Hi Rocky > > As he has several running servers and a proven backup scheme, he has a > valid > point. > > /gustav > > > >>> rockysmolin at bchacc.com 01-02-2008 17:49:53 >>> > Dear List: > > I am looking at doing a job which is ideal for an Access back end (IMO) > but > IT would prefer a SQL back end for the reasons below. I expressed the > opinion that SQL would be overkill. But they are concerned about > stability > and backup. > > How do I respond to this? Does he have a valid point? The database will > have a relatively small amount of data and 4 initially and eventually up > to > 10 users. Light entry and update. > > ********************************************************** > > I think his response about it being overkill is from the perspective that > it > is a small application which normally wouldn't warrant a MS SQL license > and > overhead. Because we already have several servers, we would not require > any > additional licenses. The real reason we would like the MS SQL backend is > for stability and backup purposes. We cannot backup an Access database > the > same way we can MS SQL because it is simply a flat file and can sometimes > not properly backup if the file is currently in use (which will be the > majority of the time). Additionally, in the past we have had problems > with > corrupt MS Access databases when multiple people are accessing it > simultaneously. I think it would be valuable to have him quote the > project > if it were done only in MS Access and the side-by-side comparison of the > same project with the MS SQL backend. Please let me know if you need > further assistance in talking to Rocky about this. > > ****************************************** > > > MTIA > > Rocky' > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.18/1254 - Release Date: > 1/31/2008 > 8:30 PM > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >