Tina Norris Fields
tinanfields at torchlake.com
Sat Feb 2 09:59:11 CST 2008
Drew, I'm so glad you said that. I kept thinking it, but didn't say it. Why ARE they backing it up when people are using it? Rocky, do you know the answer to that? Just curious. Not smart enough to really contribute to the discussion, but curious enough to follow it and ask questions. Tina Drew Wutka wrote: > If they are backing up when people are using the system, that's bad > planning, unless your app needs to be running 24/7. Also, corruption is > usually due to a bad network connection. > > However, you're fighting an uphill battle with IT with SQL vs. Access. > Just charge them more and develop it for SQL Server. > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin > at Beach Access Software > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 10:50 AM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: [AccessD] SQL vs Access > > Dear List: > > I am looking at doing a job which is ideal for an Access back end (IMO) > but > IT would prefer a SQL back end for the reasons below. I expressed the > opinion that SQL would be overkill. But they are concerned about > stability > and backup. > > How do I respond to this? Does he have a valid point? The database will > have a relatively small amount of data and 4 initially and eventually up > to > 10 users. Light entry and update. > > ********************************************************** > > I think his response about it being overkill is from the perspective > that it > is a small application which normally wouldn't warrant a MS SQL license > and > overhead. Because we already have several servers, we would not require > any > additional licenses. The real reason we would like the MS SQL backend > is > for stability and backup purposes. We cannot backup an Access database > the > same way we can MS SQL because it is simply a flat file and can > sometimes > not properly backup if the file is currently in use (which will be the > majority of the time). Additionally, in the past we have had problems > with > corrupt MS Access databases when multiple people are accessing it > simultaneously. I think it would be valuable to have him quote the > project > if it were done only in MS Access and the side-by-side comparison of the > same project with the MS SQL backend. Please let me know if you need > further assistance in talking to Rocky about this. > > ****************************************** > > > MTIA > > Rocky' > >