[AccessD] x64 tests

http://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080106004348AAZkTRr

William

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software" <rockysmolin at bchacc.com>
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] x64 tests


> Ad in the paper Sunday - Dell Inspiron 531 - AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual core
> Processor 4000+; Vista Home;1GB Ram;250BG HD;CD/DVD R/W; $299.
>
> What equivalent Intel processor would that be and at what speed?
>
> Rocky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil
> Salakhetdinov
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 4:53 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] x64 tests
>
> Well, Merriam-Webster also doesn't have the definition of 'denormalize'
>
> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/denormalize
>
>
>
> --
> Shamil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:11 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] x64 tests
>
> LOL.  you need to add denormalize and denormalized to your dictionary.
>
> John W. Colby
> Colby Consulting
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil
> Salakhetdinov
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 9:08 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] x64 tests
>
> That's my spell-checker who did introduce this funny concept :)
>
> It doesn't understand "denormalized", I should have probably used
> "de-normalized" but I didn't. I'm sorry for my English. I have manually
> corrected several "demoralized" spell-checker fixes to "denormalized" but
> forgot to fix the first one...
>
> And here you have it: "demoralized databases" :)
>
> --
> Shamil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 4:47 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] x64 tests
>
> LOL. Demoralized databases, what a concept!
>
> On 1/6/08, Shamil Salakhetdinov <shamil at users.mns.ru> wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> I thought you could have all your three tables joined and kept in
>> demoralized form...
>>
>>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1212 - Release Date: 1/6/2008
> 10:55 PM
>
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com