Jim Dettman
jimdettman at verizon.net
Thu Jan 10 17:01:23 CST 2008
If the expected usage is 100GB, then I make sure the drive space is at least 167GB. I always try to leave between 35% - 40% of free space on a volume. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 4:30 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Clients and money >>size disks so that "at capacity", they are approx 60% full Maybe I'm slow on the uptake today (blame it on my age, if you dare!) but can you explain exactly what you mean by this, Jim? Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:34 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Clients and money This once again proves the point I've been making to my clients over the past 15 years; yes, you do need to defrag and defrag on a regular basis. Microsoft has always suggested that NTFS disks don't need defragging. That's absolute baloney. I've had too many cases where I've walked in, found severe fragmentation on a server and gotten a 10 - 20% boost in performance just by defragging (especially with older hardware). You want your CPU and disk spending time processing stuff, not wasting their time with wasted overhead. I thing I like to do is size disks so that "at capacity", they are approx 60% full. This keeps fragmentation at bay somewhat and defrags will run quicker (more maneuvering room to work with). Jim. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com