jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Tue Jan 15 09:01:20 CST 2008
Jim, In this day and age I might suggest a virtual PC for each user. That way it appears as if each user has his/her own PC but it is actually a virtual machine running on virtual server on a server. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:13 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: [AccessD] Citrix Access Essentials and Access All, Anyone have *direct* experience with Access and Citrix Access Essentials? I have a client that uses Access 2000/2003 FE's against a SQL Server 2000 BE and is currently moving from AZ to OH. As part of that move, their moving to all new hardware. The services company taking care of the hardware is strongly suggesting that they use Citrix Access Essentials to handle remote users. Currently they are using remote desktop to support remote users. They only have a few remote users at present (approx 5) and their will be a dedicated server to take care of them. I don't have any direct experience with Citrix although I've heard good things about it over the years. My concerns are that it's not clear to me exactly what/how it does things in comparison to a straight RDP session, which I understand fairly well (even printing<g>). End user deployment and use will be extremely simplified as they will access the apps through a standard web browser, but it's the under the hood stuff that worries me. Any thoughts, comments, etc. Jim. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com