Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Jan 17 10:54:16 CST 2008
Hi Michael Oh, we've used it to not have to set up replication ... It's like a terminal server; all sessions of the frontend run on the server and they connect simultaneously to a shared backend. /gustav >>> mmattys at rochester.rr.com 17-01-2008 17:28 >>> Ah! - Thanks, Gustav! Are you handling synchronization? With Replication Manager or JRO / TSI Synchronizer? Michael R. Mattys MapPoint & Access Dev www.mattysconsulting.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Virtual PC > Hi Michael > > Or "even" WinConnect Server XP: > > http://www.thinsoftinc.com/product_thin_client_winconnect_server_xp.aspx > > We've used that for several clients - from a couple of users to 20 users. > Easy to set up and licensing is cheap and a snap compared to the > troublesome administration of Windows Terminal Server. > > /gustav > >>>> mmattys at rochester.rr.com 17-01-2008 16:57 >>> > In the thread "Citrix Access Essentials and Access" (Tuesday, Jan 15th), > John Colby recommended using a Virtual PC for each user run from a > common server. > > I have a request from a potential client who will need to synchronize appx > 8 computers to a central database. Therefore, I would like ask for > comments > on the Virtual PC methodology as to how it would fare versus Jet > Replication > and Citrix or even Terminal Server. (Pros/Cons) > > Michael R. Mattys > MapPoint & Access Dev > www.mattysconsulting.com