Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Jan 24 08:10:49 CST 2008
Hi Paul Just noticed your OT(why?) and SQL Server 2005. Thus - in my previous post - database file could be replaced with just database. Note too, that we do have a list for SQL Server: http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver /gustav >>> paul.hartland at fsmail.net 24-01-2008 14:20:09 >>> To all, We have an adminstration database, and a couple of months ago built a utility to scan employee's photo's. Currently we store the photo's under an employee folder, then have sub-folders with their payroll number. This seems to work ok, but what is the preferred way, is this method correct, or should I be storing the photo in the actual table on 2005 against their record, or would this cause too much bloat to the database ? Thanks in advance for any help on this. Paul Hartland