[AccessD] Old Dog - New Tricks

Robert L. Stewart robert at webedb.com
Mon Jan 28 13:05:40 CST 2008


I disagree with Drew. I stopped trying to do anything on the
web until .Net came out because it was simply too difficult.

I would move to VS 2008 and not go with 2005 or earlier. The
reason is the ability to port between windows and browser using
XAML.

Rocky, you (or someone) asked about porting back and forth between
the two. Simply put, you don't. They are entirely two different
animals. VS 2008 and XAML will allow it to happen though.

Robert

At 12:00 PM 1/28/2008, you wrote:
>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:37:18 -0600
>From: "Drew Wutka" <DWUTKA at Marlow.com>
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] Old Dog - New Tricks
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
>         <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Message-ID:
>         <A5615CBECEC42E4791D7A7C724E1E9B2E61984 at MIEXCH.marlow.ii-vi.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>Rocky, I STRONGLY recommend that you learn HTML and ASP.  ASP.Net is
>handy, but the reason I recommend learning the older ASP is two fold.
>One, you need NO special tools to use it.  You can write ASP with
>notepad.  It's just a script.  ASP.Net has 'events', which I could be
>written with Notepad, but you would need to know how to 'code' the
>events.  The second reason, is that ASP.Net is a little misleading as to
>how it actually works.  For example, it will give you an OnClick event
>for a button.  It makes it appear like the user has a 'live' connection
>to the webserver, when they really don't.  It does this using client
>side scripting.  Learning classic ASP will help you understand web
>page/server interactions a lot better.
>
>Drew





More information about the AccessD mailing list