Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Mon Jan 28 19:10:08 CST 2008
On 28 Jan 2008 at 10:17, Gustav Brock wrote: > Hi Stuart > > Why is it "much better"? I haven't worked with it (Access, or rather > JET is always at hand) so my experience is nil. > > I can think of the SQL syntax - which I understand is identical to the > normal SQL Server - and that it can run on PDAs, but doesn't it have > pretty much the same limitations (size etc.) than Access JET? Jet, according to MS is "depreciated technology. It is no longer part of MDAC. There don't appear be be any intentions to support it on 64bit OS. Are you sure that it will always be available on the target system? With SSCE, you distribute a few DLLs with your application and you know that the environment is exactly the same as on your development machine - no nasty surprises with different versions of DLLs on client machines. Apart from that: Data Types -- SQL Server datatypes - indexable text longer than 255 characters, dates to millisecond, BigInts... ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) and Transactions - it's more robust and easier to recover from corruption in the event of system crach etc etc. Transactions Stronger password and encyrption