Edward S Zuris
edzedz at comcast.net
Thu Jul 3 15:27:32 CDT 2008
FWIW, For What It's Worth. Someone in sales, somewhere, is talking to clients into upgrading to Access 2007. In one way it is a pain, unless a client has a budget, then it might mean more billable hours. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Doug Steele Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:19 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Article on stuff broken in Access 2007 I am being forced to work into Access 2007 by two of my clients. One is a branch of a large corporation which has switched completely to Office 2007 as company policy. At the moment 'my' branch is running several Access 2000 BE/FE databases under Access 2007. There have been minor issues, but no significant problems. We will convert over to full Access 2007 databases gradually. The other client is running a network with mixed Access 2003/Access 2007; the owner is a 'bleeding edge technology' fan who is keen to convert fully to 2007 and is also pressuring me to try using SQL Server Express as the BE. We have had some significant problems (like failed updates and bizarre fatal errors) on the machines running Access 2007, but unfortunately most problems have been intermittent and not reproducible on my Access 2007 development system (running in a virtual machine). FWIW, it doesn't seem to matter whether the Access 2007 machines run the FE as an Access 2003 .mdb or a converted Access 2007 .accdb. Doug Steele On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Charlotte Foust <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> wrote: > Does anyone in this list actually USE A2007? > > Charlotte Foust > > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com