Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at users.mns.ru
Wed Mar 26 12:42:19 CDT 2008
<<< He just tries to provoke you. >>> "No, really. Continuously. We dismiss ideas more readily than less intelligent people. it's our blessing and our curse." http://www.secretgeek.net/hate_week_08.asp ? -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:28 PM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] Find characters in one string that are in another:was RE: Treat string as array Hi Charlotte When you write here you are very precise, so I guess your coding is exactly to the point. He just tries to provoke you. /gustav >>> cfoust at infostatsystems.com 26-03-2008 16:42:31 >>> And pigs will fly any day now! I lost that war years ago. He sees my code as "over-complicated". Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bahr Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:36 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Find characters in one string that are in another: was RE: Treat string as array Hi Charlotte, instr only returns a positive value if the string part is found and is rather static in looking for a string. Regex's are dynamic in looking for strings and its derivatives plus it returns a boolean if the pattern is matched--at this point we do not care about the string position. Perhaps you can convince your boss that you want to take things to the next level so you can be more productive. :-) Mike... > Yep, I love em. My boss prefers InStr as more "readable", so I don't > get to use them very often ... Even in dot net. :-< > > Charlotte Foust -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com