jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Tue May 20 10:35:54 CDT 2008
To be quite honest, I do not use random autonumbers but it seems that the entire question is moot since you don't have "holes" anymore. How the random generator decides that a number is not already used is beyond me, but I assume that it checks. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Heenan, Lambert wrote: > Just out of curiosity, does the manual method of resetting the autonumber > seed handle tables where the autonumber is random instead of sequential - > like in a replicated table? > > Lambert > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:37 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Autonumber problem > > > The moral being your mileage may vary. > > Yup. However the fact that this happened at all says that somewhere the bug > is striking again. Either there is an unpatched workstation being used to > C/R the database BE or the bug has resurfaced, which wouldn't surprise me. > > BTW, it does not have to do with the BE container revision - 2k, 2k3 etc. > It was a known bug in the C/R itself, thus almost certainly a bug in JET. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com >