A.D.Tejpal
adtp at airtelmail.in
Wed Sep 17 13:43:02 CDT 2008
Chester, My sample db named Query_CompareTables might be of interest to you. It is available at Rogers Access Library (other developers library). Link - http://www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/forum_topics.asp?FID=45 The sample is in Access 2000 File Format (Reference required: DAO 3.6). Brief description is given below. Best wishes, A.D. Tejpal ------------ Query_CompareTables (Sample Db) Brief Description =========================== Discrepancies in the contents of two tables (for records identified by combination of PtID and AdmDate) are displayed as follows: 1 - Non-Matching records: (a) These are displayed in the subform at right. For each row, the name of its source table is also shown. (b) Each row is highlighted (separate back colors, depending upon the source table name). (c) For the fields under comparison, only those values are shown where there is a discrepancy between the two tables. Other fields (having no deviation) appear blank. (d) Displayed non-matching values are highlighted (separate back colors depending upon which table the field belongs to). 2 - Missing records (Existing in one table but not the other): (a) These are displayed in the subform at left. For each row, the name of its source table is also shown. (b) Each row is highlighted (separate back colors, depending upon the source table name). =================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: Kaup, Chester To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 00:39 Subject: [AccessD] Comparing Tables I have two tables. The first table contains a master list of wells. The second table contains a list of wells with automated test equipment. Only some of the wells are automated. I need to generate a list of all the wells with a flag field with a value of "A" if the well is automated and a value of "M" if it is not. I can probably do this with an unmatched query giving me a list of the manual wells and then another query to combine the second table and the results of this query but was looking for any ideas of a better way to do this. Chester Kaup